Recent Comments
- nmw on We interrupt our regular programming to bring you this special report…
- nmw on The Difference between Nobody and Somebody
- nmw on Impediments to Change: Positive Good, Negative Bad
- nmw on Youtube users post angry comments because Ted Williams (OH) video was removed; no comment from Columbia Dispatch
- nmw on Q: Why Wasn’t I Consulted? A: Because I want an expert answer to my question, not just some know-it-all knee-jerk response
Linked In News Network
Linked In News Network Community Websites / Blogs:Linked In News
English Network News
3>Weblogs (Blog Categories)
Index of Topics / Keywords / Keyword Tags
-
Recent Posts
- Richard Edelman on trust in media melange
- Paul Krugman’s editorial vindicates a post I made last week
- Neville Hobson and Shel Holtz Interview Adam Kmiec
- The Social Contract is a Human Information Technology with which Society + Its Members Advance Civilization (i.e. social information + communication is a practice used in communities to uplift those who interact + contribute to social awareness)
- Social Media Advice from Adam Kmiec
- Web 3.0: The End of Google as we Know it
- It’s the end of the search as we know it :)
- STOP SPAM
- Top Blogs + Top Bloggers vs. The Enlightenment + Illiterate People
- The Occupy Movement gets freedom — but do either the 1% or the 99% really get freedom?
- An Alternative Domain Registration Model for the ICANN Top Level Domains Idea
- More mainstream media spin
- Angela Merkel discredits American Ratings Agencies
- Stefan Magdalinski (Founder / CEO of Mocality in Kenya) has some questions for Google
- Seems like Friday the 13th is not a good day for Google
- A government *IS* a corporation
- Language Limitation Hypothesis: Linguistic Expressions can only give an impressionistic sense of thoughts / ideas
- I don’t need any facts, I just want your opinions
- Occupy Management (?)
- The Biggest Problem We Face is Our Biggest Opportunity to Grow
Archives
Meta
Richard Edelman on trust in media melange
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged business, community, education, information, media, propaganda, search
Leave a comment
Paul Krugman’s editorial vindicates a post I made last week
See “Entrepreneurs cannot exist in a vacuum” (I must admit that I was also familiar with Professor Krugman’s “clusters” ideas before I wrote this)
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged business, community, economics, ethics, global, goals, world
Leave a comment
Neville Hobson and Shel Holtz Interview Adam Kmiec
At about the same time as I wrote the post about Adam Kmiec’s “social media advice“, Shel Holtz and Neville Hobson were on the telephone with Adam Kmiec — and it has already been posted at the FIR homepage (note that the blog post includes a link to post I wrote at the bestopop forum — which includes blog posts from many online properties, and is open for public comments; the Blog/IM Zone @ Saarpfalz is a community website much like facebook.com, but it is built using WordPress and Buddypress).
Since writing the post, I have been thinking “why don’t I follow Adam’s, Neville’s and Shel’s blog posts?” — and now I have decided I will include their RSS feeds @ groups.linked.in … and hopefully I (and maybe some other editors I hope to invite to review business news there) can review their writing and ideas there — the way I do with other prominent thinkers (when I get around to it
).
The Social Contract is a Human Information Technology with which Society + Its Members Advance Civilization (i.e. social information + communication is a practice used in communities to uplift those who interact + contribute to social awareness)
Are intellectual property rights social wrongs? The Social Contract as Human Information Technology: How Individual Character is Socially Constructed Via Social Interaction
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged community, education, ethics, information, language, propaganda
Leave a comment
Social Media Advice from Adam Kmiec
A couple years ago, I still read “tweets” (that is what a lot of so-called social media gurus call blog posts posted at twitter.com). Back then, one of my favorite authors @ twitter.com was Adam Kmiec.
After I stopped paying attention to twitter.com, I also lost sight of Adam Kmiec — maybe that’s a big mistake (yet even if it is: I’m not really sure who is “responsible” for it
). Adam works in a different “field” than I do, but I do enjoy his perspective on things — I feel much of it coincides with my own… so perhaps it’s just as well I also pay attention to other sources, rather than simply wallowing in “echo chambers” that simply give me a “good feeling” about my own perspective.
Adam Kmiec was mentioned on a recent “For Immediate Release” podcast (I regularly listen to this podcast, because I feel that Shel and Neville have their finger on the pulse of so-called “social media” — and while I do not pay much attention to something that apparently cannot even be defined [as Malcolm Gladwell conceded to me in a chat about one of his New Yorker articles on the topic], I do understand that there are a lot of people who pay attention to whatever they think it might be, and Shel and Neville do a very good job at condensing all of the hot air in this space into the droplets they include in their weekly podcast [note, BTW, that I often feel OK with listening to this podcast quite a long time after it is published, because Shel and Neville are so on top of news, that they have it long before it makes its way into mainstream media]).
They mentioned it was about something of a spat between two companies — Walgreens and “Express Scripts”, and that Walgreens had chosen to terminate the business relationship they had with Express Scripts.
Well, so like a regular moron, I keyed “Walgreens” into the search box at Google — and found basically nothing. So I added “Express Scripts” (in quotes) — I got some more, but I still wasn’t satisfied. Most important: I discovered that the top 100 results did not include any commentary from walgreens.com (I would expect Walgreens to make a statement about terminating a cooperation related to something on the order of $4 billion in revenues — as Shel and Neville had mentioned). So I gave up on Google and went to walgreens.com.
Again, I didn’t find anything — at least not directly on the homepage or via some company news link I clicked on. So I decided to use the walgreens search engine — BING: That was a hit!!
The result was a site called www.ichoosewalgreens.com — and this made it quite easy for me to understand the issue “at a glance”. Basically, it boils down to these 2 points:
-
Express Scripts insisted on being able to unilaterally define contract terms, including what does and does not constitute a brand and generic drug, which would have denied Walgreens the predictability necessary to reliably plan its business operations going forward.
-
Express Scripts rejected Walgreens request to be informed in advance if Express Scripts intended to add or transfer a prescription drug plan to a different Express Scripts pharmacy network, and to provide patients with equal access to Walgreens retail pharmacies. Walgreens cannot reliably plan business operations without clear terms, transparency and predictability governing the provider network relationship.
Shel and Neville were concerned about the way so-called “social media” fanatics were responding to the way the topic was being covered in blogs. I find Adam Kmiec has very good advice on this:
[L]et’s break this down, because this is an important concept for any person in a leadership capacity to understand:
Don’t make decisions on what AdAge, the New York Times, Seth Godin or any person/company/publication will think, unless your strategy is focused on making sure you earn their praise, support, etc. Their job is to cover the story and your job is to trust your insights and gut.
Never use anecdotal feedback as a proxy for real data. It’s not a good substitute and can lead you astray.
Remember insights lead to strategy and strategy leads to the plan. If your insights are solid and strategy grounded in those insights the plan rarely fails.
Understand your audience. Similar to #1, you need to know who you’re trying to reach and what message you’re trying to deliver. In this case, the people were trying to reach don’t read Ad Age, Social Commerce Today or David’s blog. Heck, they don’t read my blog.
In my opinion, when I write something I make a contribution. If someone else is willing to defray some of the costs involved to enable me to write, then of course that would also make me happy. Yet if readers expect a free lunch, then they should probably not expect fine cuisine.
I still have no idea why people pay attention to twitter.com or google.com — maybe they just have nothing better to do with their time?
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged advertising, business, community, ethics, media, propaganda, search
Leave a comment
Web 3.0: The End of Google as we Know it
Following up on yesterday’s post about how even Danny Sullivan has now basically called out Google as corrupt (and “evil”), I believe it is now time to move on.
As a first step in this direction, I share some first ideas about what it means to be a member of a group.
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged business, community, education, ethics, help, language
Leave a comment
It’s the end of the search as we know it :)
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged business, community, education, goals, information, language, life, media, search
Leave a comment
STOP SPAM
If you want to say something, please say it once… — and then shut up.
Thanks!
Top Blogs + Top Bloggers vs. The Enlightenment + Illiterate People
Paul Krugman is confused — he declares that he is anti-social:
I don’t use any social media; the only legit Twitter account is the robot announcing new posts on this blog. Oh, and I don’t post comments on other peoples’ blogs, either. Anyone posting other than in the column and on this blog claiming to be me is a fraud, and probably malicious.
I do admit that I myself have often said that using someone else’s website (such as Google or Twitter or Facebook) to “hide” your identity is completely ludicrous: The only people anyone would hide from by doing that is illiterate morons (yet granted: there are quite a few of these). Most reasonable people don’t pay attention to mainstream media, because they know it is mostly propaganda.
“Ah, but why do you say Paul Krugman is against The Enlightenment?” you may ask — oh, yes: thank you for asking!
Kant’s Categorical Imperative is often translated as:
Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.
(note that my source for the text was actually a Google snippet of the wikipedia.org page)
So, if Paul Krugman supported this central Enlightenment ideal, then he would not pay any attention to people who comment on his blog (perhaps he would not even permit comments on his blog — seeing as he views them as a complete waste of time and energy, he might want to support the improvement of the global economy by not enabling people to fail so miserably) — but he does. He pays a lot of attention to people who comment on his blog — as does the “community management” team at the nytimes.com (a lot of information gets removed / censored — primarily for prudish “foul language” reasons).
So what Paul Krugman says and what Paul Krugman does contradict each other — that’s confusion.
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged censorship, community, ethics, information, media, propaganda
Leave a comment
The Occupy Movement gets freedom — but do either the 1% or the 99% really get freedom?
Several years ago I was introduced to “Open Space Technology” — a rather new approach to organisation and group behavior (see Occupy Open Space) — and in my view the Occupy Movement has indeed embraced much of the thinking behind such “open” organisational stucture (or, rather: non-structure). Indeed, mainstream media has often attacked the Occupy Movement for being leaderless or without any clear objectives.
In my opinion, one of the greatest strengths of the Occupy Movement is that it refuses to be pigeon-holed. Therefore: It cannot be forced into a corner, it can turn on a dime, it can let go of an idea that doesn’t work, it can easily reorganize, and so on.
100% — the entire world — should expect this.
Posted in news.linked.in
Tagged business, community, economics, economy, global, goals, government, life, media, regulation, world
Leave a comment