Recent Comments
- nmw on We interrupt our regular programming to bring you this special report…
- nmw on The Difference between Nobody and Somebody
- nmw on Impediments to Change: Positive Good, Negative Bad
- nmw on Youtube users post angry comments because Ted Williams (OH) video was removed; no comment from Columbia Dispatch
- nmw on Q: Why Wasn’t I Consulted? A: Because I want an expert answer to my question, not just some know-it-all knee-jerk response
Linked In News Network
Linked In News Network Community Websites / Blogs:Linked In News
English Network News
3>Weblogs (Blog Categories)
Index of Topics / Keywords / Keyword Tags
-
Recent Posts
- “You have to be paid in order to be good.”
- The distinction between paid content and free content has ALWAYS been bogus
- Users buy containers because they expect to get value out of their contents
- If words weren’t here, I don’t think…
- Irrational denotations off the deep end
- Cory Doctorow is able to make reading news about the behavior of illiterate people entertaining
- Not so fast!
- Social animals — such as primates — like to communicate (in order to be social)
- Ideas shared online are just as authentic, reliable and trustworthy as ideas shared in printed books
- Do we have to choose what we want to know?
- Latest Breaking News: People are increasingly becoming disenchanted with bogus values
- How to live a successful life
- Everyday, I’m shufflin the deck
- Success is keeping our independence forever?
- New German Government Question + Answer Website off to a very slow start
- Anonymous 2012 message to world leaders
- Google’s Privacy Policy doesn’t matter — for all I care, they can take their privacy policy and shove it where the sun don’t shine! ;P
- Richard Edelman on trust in media melange
- Paul Krugman’s editorial vindicates a post I made last week
- Neville Hobson and Shel Holtz Interview Adam Kmiec
Archives
Meta
Wisdom Revisited, Part 3: From Segmented Population to Reality Segments (via the Segmentation of Audience Membership)
If you haven’t read part 1 or part 2 yet, you’ll need to catch up!
IMO, the foundation for this world view is now beginning to take on a farm — such that some people might actually be be able to call “heads or tails” on it. Heads I win, tails you lose — so here comes part 3.
In another recent article (“How Markets are configured by Language“), I described how communities have over time moved continually from being small and localized (i.e., a multitude of diverse populations, segmented this way or that) to becoming larger and more generalized (i.e., a universal online network — the so-called global village). As i have sought to indicate in my previous two installments, a wide array of technological developments related to the storage and retrieval of information have in the meantime created a world in which our “universe of knowledge” appears to have vastly expanded in a relatively short period of time. However: Even if this were indeed the case, we ought not to let ourselves be “blinded by the light” (so to speak
Nobody is unbiased. Those who think biases are “old fashioned” and no longer exist are primarily laying bare their own bias of naivet�.
Instead, what technology “has done for us” lately is to make it easier for us to see more perspectives — more different views of the same reality. Previously, reality had been condensed into the front page headlines. Today, there are billions of front pages — each front page having its own perspective, its own point of view. The task before the edicuated user — the user with “online literacy” — is not first of all to select information from the universe of knowledge, but rather to select points of views (perspectives) from the universe of portals to knowledge. Today, the user can choose — and must choose (even if they are ignorant of their choice) — not only his/her own bias, but also the bias of the portals (which are the instruments they use to observe reality). If we were to view the entire universe of perspectives on reality, then we might say that users self-select the reality segments they wish to observe.
This entry was posted in linked (legacy). Bookmark the permalink.